Laura’s practice focuses primarily on intellectual property litigation and patent counseling. Her litigation background involves a wide array of technologies, including chemical, electronics, radio controlled devices, and semiconductor technology. She has experience in dealing with all phases of litigation, including discovery, motion practice, summary judgment, and trial. Additionally, her practice includes counseling clients in intellectual property matters, such as patent licensing and mediation.

Representative Experience
Ripmax Ltd. v. Horizon Hobby, Inc., Case No. 2:07cv2133, United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois (jury verdict of invalidity on anticipation and obviousness grounds)

WM Wrigley Co. v. Cadbury Adams USA, Case No. 1:04cv00346, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Casio Inc. v. Papst Licensing GMBH & Co. KG, Case No. 1:06cv01751, United States District Court for the District of Columbia & MDL: In re Papst Licensing, MDL Docket No. 1880

Silicon Graphics, Inc. v. ATI Technologies, Case No. 06-c-0611, United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin

Hayes v. L3 Communications, Case No. 07cv1853, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Eon-Net v. Linens ‘n Things, Case No. 2:06cv00315, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

Landis+Gyr v. Elster Electricity LLC, Case No. 1:06cv00082, Untied States District Court for the District of Delaware

Stryker Trauma S.A. v. Synthes USA, Case No. 2:01cv03879, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey